Test case expects 404 Not Found, but URL used is actually same as one
used in 200 OK case.
Change-Id: Icf7da8237b483cdf13eccbb4a8bb17c23f300733
Issue-ID: CCSDK-558
Signed-off-by: Timoney, Dan (dt5972) <dt5972@att.com>
private HttpHeaders headers;\r
private ResponseEntity<ConfigModel> entity;\r
\r
private HttpHeaders headers;\r
private ResponseEntity<ConfigModel> entity;\r
\r
@Before\r
public void setUp(){\r
headers = new HttpHeaders();\r
headers.set("Accept", MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE);\r
entity = this.restTemplate\r
.exchange("/api/v1/config-model/1", HttpMethod.GET, new HttpEntity<>(headers),ConfigModel.class);\r
@Before\r
public void setUp(){\r
headers = new HttpHeaders();\r
headers.set("Accept", MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON_VALUE);\r
entity = this.restTemplate\r
.exchange("/api/v1/config-model/1", HttpMethod.GET, new HttpEntity<>(headers),ConfigModel.class);\r
Assert.assertNotNull("failed to get response Config model",entity.getBody());\r
}\r
\r
Assert.assertNotNull("failed to get response Config model",entity.getBody());\r
}\r
\r
- @Test\r
- public void testConfigModelFailure() {\r
- assertThat(entity.getStatusCode()).isEqualTo(HttpStatus.NOT_FOUND);\r
- Assert.assertNotNull("failed to get response Config model",entity.getBody());\r
- }\r